Skip to content
Photo Credit: Alpha Coders

Number 28 of 100 in 100, The Boeing B-17 Fortress ✈️🏅

Legend of the Sky: The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress




The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress was born out of the growing need for a long-range, high-altitude heavy bomber in the 1930s. During this time, military aviation was evolving rapidly, and nations were seeking to bolster their air power with more advanced and capable aircraft. The U.S. Army Air Corps (USAAC) recognized the necessity of a bomber that could deliver a substantial payload over great distances, thereby providing strategic bombing capabilities.


Military Strategy Shifts: The interwar period saw a shift in military strategies, emphasizing the importance of air superiority and strategic bombing. The USAAC wanted an aircraft that could penetrate deep into enemy territory, targeting industrial and military infrastructure to cripple the adversary’s war-making potential.


Technological Advances: Advances in aircraft design and engine technology during the 1930s made it feasible to envision a bomber with unprecedented range, speed, and payload capacity. The development of more powerful and reliable engines, improved aerodynamics, and innovations in aircraft construction materials contributed to the feasibility of the B-17's design.


Pilot and Crew Requirements: Pilots and aircrews were demanding aircraft that could offer better performance, safety, and operational capabilities. There was a need for a bomber that could defend itself against enemy fighters, withstand significant damage, and provide a stable platform for bombing runs. The concept of a "flying fortress" with multiple gun positions for defensive armament directly addressed these demands.


Market Trends: Globally, there was a trend towards developing multi-engine bombers as nations recognized the limitations of single-engine bombers in terms of range and payload. The B-17's design aimed to capitalize on this trend by offering a robust, four-engine platform that could outperform contemporary bombers in these crucial aspects.


Response to Competition: The B-17 was developed in response to a USAAC competition for a new multi-engine bomber. Boeing’s Model 299, which eventually became the B-17, was designed to meet and exceed the competition’s specifications, offering superior range, speed, and payload capacity compared to its rivals.


The culmination of these factors led to the creation of the B-17 Flying Fortress, an aircraft that would go on to become one of the most iconic and effective bombers of World War II.


Original Design:


The original design of the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress incorporated several standout features that catered specifically to its intended role as a heavy bomber for strategic bombing missions. These design elements were revolutionary at the time and set the B-17 apart from other aircraft.


Four-Engine Configuration: One of the most distinctive features of the B-17 was its four-engine layout. Powered by Wright R-1820 Cyclone radial engines, this configuration provided the necessary power and redundancy for long-range missions. This setup allowed the B-17 to carry a substantial bomb load over significant distances while also providing better performance and safety compared to twin-engine bombers.


All-Metal Monocoque Construction: The B-17 featured an all-metal, semi-monocoque fuselage, which was a significant advancement in aircraft design at the time. This construction method provided greater structural strength and durability, allowing the aircraft to withstand battle damage and rough operational conditions.


Defensive Armament: To defend against enemy fighters, the B-17 was equipped with multiple machine gun positions. The original design included a nose turret, dorsal (top) turret, ventral (bottom) turret, waist gun positions, and a tail gun. This extensive defensive armament earned the B-17 its "Flying Fortress" nickname, as it could provide a robust defense against attacks from all directions.


Bomb Load and Bay: The B-17 was designed with a large internal bomb bay that could accommodate various bomb loads, up to 8,000 pounds (3,600 kg) in the original versions. This allowed for flexible mission planning, enabling the aircraft to carry different types of bombs depending on the mission requirements.


High-Altitude Performance: The B-17 was designed to operate at high altitudes, up to 35,000 feet (10,668 meters). This altitude capability provided several tactical advantages, including the ability to fly above the range of many anti-aircraft guns and enemy fighters of the time. 


Durability and Redundancy: The B-17's design emphasized durability and redundancy. The aircraft could continue flying even with significant damage to its structure or engines. There are numerous accounts of B-17s returning to base with large portions of their wings, tails, or fuselage missing, a testament to the ruggedness of its design.


Crew Accommodations: The B-17 was designed to accommodate a crew of ten, including the pilot, co-pilot, bombardier, navigator, radio operator, and various gunners. The layout of the crew positions was optimized for efficiency and communication during missions.


These original design features made the B-17 Flying Fortress a formidable and effective bomber during World War II. Its combination of firepower, range, payload capacity, and durability allowed it to perform a wide variety of bombing missions with significant success.


Photo Credit:


Design Team:


The principal designer behind the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress was Edward C. Wells, who played a pivotal role in its development. Wells was an aeronautical engineer and a key member of Boeing's design team.


Wells graduated from the University of Washington with a degree in aeronautical engineering. He joined Boeing in 1931 and quickly rose through the ranks due to his exceptional engineering skills and innovative approach to aircraft design.


As the chief project engineer, Wells was instrumental in the design and development of the B-17. His work focused on creating a bomber that was robust, reliable, and capable of long-range missions. After the success of the B-17, Wells continued to contribute to Boeing's bomber projects, including the design and development of the B-29 Superfortress, another iconic World War II bomber known for its advanced technology and long-range capabilities.


The design of the B-17 was a collaborative effort involving several talented engineers and designers at Boeing.


  1. Gifford Emery worked closely with Wells and was a significant contributor to the aerodynamic design of the B-17. Emery had extensive experience in aerodynamics and had previously worked on various Boeing aircraft projects.


Philip Johnson was another crucial member of the B-17 design team, focusing on structural engineering and overall aircraft performance. He brought a wealth of knowledge in aircraft structures and had been involved in earlier Boeing projects.


George S. Schairer provided critical input on the aerodynamic aspects of the B-17, ensuring that the aircraft could achieve the required performance specifications. Schairer later became well-known for his work on the Boeing B-47 Stratojet and other advanced jet aircraft.


Before the B-17, the Boeing design team worked on several significant projects, including the Model 247, an early twin-engine commercial airliner that influenced many future designs. The Boeing P-26 Peashooter, a pursuit aircraft, was another project that showcased Boeing’s capabilities in military aircraft design.


The team’s expertise also contributed to the post-war development of commercial airliners, such as the Boeing 707, which became one of the first successful commercial jetliners.


Edward C. Wells and his team’s innovative work on the B-17 laid the groundwork for many of Boeing’s future successes, cementing their legacy in both military and commercial aviation.


Production Run:


The production history of the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is a testament to its importance and effectiveness during World War II.


First Production: The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress first took flight on July 28, 1935. The prototype, known as the Model 299, impressed the U.S. Army Air Corps, leading to an initial order.


Initial Production: The first production model, designated the B-17B, was delivered in 1939. This model incorporated several improvements over the prototype, including more powerful engines and enhanced defensive armament.






Production Period: 1939-1940


Units Produced: 39


Features: Featured significant upgrades from the prototype, including redesigned tail surfaces and more defensive armament.




Production Period: 1940-1941


Units Produced: 80 (B-17C), 42 (B-17D)


Features: Further enhancements in defensive armament and engine performance.




Production Period: 1941-1942


Units Produced: 512


Features: Introduced the distinctive large tail and powered turrets, significantly improving defensive capabilities.




Production Period: 1942-1943


Units Produced: 3,405


Features: Enhanced range and payload capacity, with additional improvements to armament and armor.




Production Period: 1943-1945


Units Produced: 8,680


Features: The most produced and advanced variant, featuring a chin turret for better defense against frontal attacks and other refinements to improve combat effectiveness.


Total Units Produced: Approximately 12,731 B-17s were produced from 1936 to 1945.


Production Facilities: Production was not limited to Boeing alone. Due to the high demand, the B-17 was also built by other manufacturers under license, including Douglas Aircraft Company and Lockheed (through its subsidiary, Vega).


Significant Changes in Production Volume: Production volumes saw a dramatic increase during World War II, particularly after the U.S. entered the war in 1941. The peak production period was between 1943 and 1944, driven by the urgent need for heavy bombers to support the Allied bombing campaigns over Europe and the Pacific.


End of Production: Production of the B-17 ceased in May 1945 as World War II was coming to an end. By this time, newer bomber designs, such as the Boeing B-29 Superfortress, were taking over the roles previously filled by the B-17.


The extensive production run and the numerous variants of the B-17 Flying Fortress highlight its critical role during the war. Its robust design, combined with continuous improvements, ensured that it remained a formidable force throughout the conflict.

Photo Credit: - David Roseberry




The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress underwent significant evolution throughout its production run, with numerous upgrades, modifications, and variants introduced to enhance its performance, survivability, and effectiveness.




Upgrades: This first production version incorporated several changes from the prototype, including redesigned tail surfaces for better stability and enhanced defensive armament.


Improvements: These changes improved the aircraft's handling and defensive capabilities, making it more combat-ready.




Upgrades: The B-17C introduced self-sealing fuel tanks and additional armor plating. The B-17D further improved these features and added more defensive machine guns.


Improvements: The self-sealing fuel tanks reduced the risk of fire from enemy attacks, and additional armor and armament improved crew survivability and defensive power.




Upgrades: This version featured a significant redesign with a larger vertical stabilizer, powered gun turrets, and improved engines. It also introduced a tail gun position.


Improvements: The larger tail improved stability, especially at high altitudes, while powered turrets and the tail gun position significantly enhanced defensive capabilities against enemy fighters.




Upgrades: The B-17F had more powerful Wright R-1820-97 engines, increased fuel capacity for longer range, and additional armor and armament. It also introduced a Plexiglas nose for better visibility for the bombardier.


Improvements: These changes increased the aircraft's range, bomb load capacity, and defensive firepower, making it more effective in long-range bombing missions.




Upgrades: The B-17G was the most produced and advanced variant. It introduced the chin turret with twin .50 caliber machine guns to counter head-on attacks, improved fire control systems, and further reinforced armor and structural elements.


Improvements: The chin turret addressed a critical vulnerability from frontal attacks, significantly enhancing the aircraft's overall defensive coverage. This variant also included various aerodynamic refinements and reliability improvements, making it the pinnacle of the B-17 series.


Modifications and Field Upgrades:


Field Modifications: Throughout its service, B-17s often received field modifications based on combat experience. These included additional gun positions, improved bombing sights, and various enhancements to the crew's comfort and operational efficiency.


Radar and Electronic Upgrades: Later versions and some retrofitted B-17s were equipped with advanced radar systems for navigation and bombing accuracy, particularly for night missions and operations in adverse weather conditions.


Improvements in Combat Effectiveness:


Defensive Armament: Each subsequent variant saw an increase in the number and positioning of defensive machine guns. By the time of the B-17G, the aircraft could defend itself from almost every angle, reducing losses from enemy fighters.


Bomb Load Capacity: The B-17's ability to carry heavier bomb loads and a variety of ordnance types improved its versatility in various bombing missions, from strategic targets to tactical support roles.


Survivability: Enhancements in armor, self-sealing fuel tanks, and redundant systems contributed to the B-17's legendary durability. Many stories of heavily damaged B-17s returning safely to base underscored these improvements.


Evolution in Operational Roles:


Anti-Submarine Warfare: Some B-17s were modified for anti-submarine patrols, equipped with radar and depth charges to hunt and destroy enemy submarines.


Rescue Operations: The B-17H variant was adapted for air-sea rescue missions, equipped with lifeboats and medical supplies to rescue downed airmen.


The evolution of the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress demonstrates how continuous improvements and adaptability can enhance an aircraft's effectiveness and longevity. Each upgrade addressed specific combat challenges, making the B-17 one of the most iconic and enduring bombers of World War II.




General Characteristics:


  • Crew: 10 (Pilot, Co-Pilot, Navigator, Bombardier, Radio Operator, Flight Engineer/Top Turret Gunner, Ball Turret Gunner, 2 Waist Gunners, Tail Gunner)
  • Length: 74 feet 4 inches (22.66 meters)
  • Wingspan: 103 feet 9 inches (31.62 meters)
  • Height: 19 feet 1 inch (5.82 meters)
  • Wing Area: 1,420 square feet (131.92 square meters)
  • Empty Weight: 36,135 pounds (16,391 kilograms)
  • Loaded Weight: 54,000 pounds (24,494 kilograms)
  • Maximum Takeoff Weight: 65,500 pounds (29,710 kilograms)



  • Maximum Speed: 287 mph (462 km/h) at 25,000 feet (7,620 meters)
  • Cruise Speed: 182 mph (293 km/h)
  • Range: 1,738 miles (2,797 kilometers) with 6,000-pound bomb load
  • Service Ceiling: 35,600 feet (10,850 meters)
  • Rate of Climb: 900 feet per minute (4.6 meters per second)
  • Wing Loading: 38 pounds/square foot (186 kg/m²)
  • Powerplant: 4 × Wright R-1820-97 Cyclone radial engines, 1,200 hp (895 kW) each



  • Bomb Load: Up to 8,000 pounds (3,600 kilograms) internally, with provisions for external loads for specific missions
  • Defensive Armament:
    • 13 × .50 caliber (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns
      • 2 in nose (chin) turret
      • 2 in dorsal (top) turret
      • 2 in ventral (ball) turret
      • 2 in waist positions (one each side)
      • 2 in tail position
      • 1 each in left and right cheek positions
      • 1 in radio room position


Avionics and Systems:

  • Navigation: AN/APQ-13 radar, AN/APN-1 LORAN navigation system
  • Bombsight: Norden bombsight for high-precision bombing
  • Communication: SCR-522 VHF radio, Liaison radio
  • Oxygen System: Continuous flow oxygen system for high-altitude operations
  • Self-Sealing Fuel Tanks: To minimize the risk of fire after taking damage


In Comparison to Other Aircraft in its Class:


When comparing the B-17G Flying Fortress to other heavy bombers of World War II, several factors stand out:


Range and Endurance: The B-17 had a competitive range, allowing it to reach strategic targets deep within enemy territory. While the B-24 Liberator had a longer range, the B-17's range was sufficient for most missions in Europe and the Pacific.


Defensive Armament: The B-17 was renowned for its heavy defensive armament. The addition of the chin turret in the B-17G model addressed earlier vulnerabilities to head-on attacks, making it one of the best-defended bombers of the war.


Durability and Survivability: The B-17's reputation for withstanding heavy damage and still returning home was unmatched. Stories of B-17s flying back with severe structural damage highlighted its robustness compared to other bombers like the B-24 Liberator and the Avro Lancaster.


Payload: The B-17 could carry a substantial bomb load, though it was generally less than the B-24 and the British Lancaster, both of which could carry larger payloads over similar distances.


Operational Ceiling: The B-17's ability to operate at higher altitudes gave it an advantage in avoiding some anti-aircraft fire and enemy fighters, although this was a shared feature with other contemporary bombers.


Crew Comfort and Safety: While the B-17 was not known for its crew comfort due to the unpressurized cabins and cold temperatures at high altitudes, its redundant systems and extensive armament provided a higher degree of safety for the crew.


The B-17G Flying Fortress was a well-balanced heavy bomber with an emphasis on durability, defensive armament, and high-altitude performance. These attributes made it a cornerstone of the Allied strategic bombing campaign during World War II.

Photo Credit: - Alevik




V-Speeds (Velocity Speeds):


  • Vne (Never Exceed Speed): 325 mph (523 km/h)
  • Vno (Maximum Structural Cruising Speed): 250 mph (402 km/h)
  • Va (Maneuvering Speed): 175 mph (282 km/h)
  • Vfe (Maximum Flap Extended Speed): 160 mph (257 km/h)
  • Vle (Maximum Landing Gear Extended Speed): 150 mph (241 km/h)
  • Vso (Stall Speed in Landing Configuration): 83 mph (134 km/h)
  • Vs1 (Stall Speed in Clean Configuration): 92 mph (148 km/h)


G Load Limitations:


  • Maximum Positive G Load: +3.0 G
  • Maximum Negative G Load: -1.0 G


Approved Maneuvers:


  • Level Flight: Normal and combat cruising.
  • Climbing and Descending Turns: For navigation and combat engagement.
  • Steep Turns: Up to 45 degrees of bank.
  • Combat Maneuvers: Basic evasive actions, such as shallow dives and climbing turns to avoid enemy fire.
  • Formation Flying: Flying in close formation with other aircraft, crucial for maintaining defensive integrity during missions.
  • Emergency Descent: Controlled rapid descent to avoid enemy fighters or to escape anti-aircraft fire.
  • Bombing Runs: Precision level bombing from high altitudes.


Suitability for Training and Personal Aviation




  • Crew Coordination: The B-17G provides an excellent platform for training multiple crew members simultaneously, promoting teamwork and coordination essential for bomber operations.
  • Systems Familiarity: Trainees can gain hands-on experience with complex systems, including engine management, navigation, and defensive armament operation.
  • High-Altitude Operations: Training in high-altitude flight techniques, oxygen management, and understanding the challenges of long-duration missions.


Personal Aviation:


  • Historical Significance: The B-17G offers a unique opportunity for personal aviation enthusiasts to experience flying an iconic World War II aircraft, with its rich history and legacy.
  • Flight Characteristics: While not designed for personal aviation, the B-17's robust and stable flight characteristics make it a manageable aircraft for experienced pilots.
  • Display and Airshows: Ideal for participation in airshows and historical displays, offering spectators a glimpse into aviation history.
  • Vintage Aircraft Experience: Provides a nostalgic flying experience, replicating the conditions and environment of World War II bomber missions.


The Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress's performance characteristics are well-suited to its original role as a strategic heavy bomber. While its application in modern training and personal aviation is limited due to its size, complexity, and operational costs, it remains an invaluable aircraft for historical education, training, and preservation. Its ruggedness, stability, and rich heritage continue to captivate aviation enthusiasts and historians alike.


Safety Record:


The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress has a storied operational history, particularly during World War II. Given its extensive use in combat, its safety record is often examined in the context of wartime operations and peacetime uses.


Common Safety Concerns:


  1. Combat Damage:
    • Incidents: The B-17 frequently sustained severe damage from anti-aircraft fire (flak) and enemy fighters. Despite this, many B-17s were able to return to base with substantial damage, demonstrating its robustness.
    • Concerns: Vulnerabilities included the underbelly (until the ball turret was introduced) and head-on attacks (addressed with the chin turret in the B-17G).
  2. Engine Failures:
    • Incidents: The B-17's four-engine configuration provided redundancy, but engine failures were not uncommon due to mechanical issues or combat damage.
    • Concerns: Pilots needed to manage asymmetric thrust and power loss, which required significant skill and training.
  3. Structural Integrity:
    • Incidents: The B-17's ability to sustain damage and remain airborne was remarkable. Many incidents involved structural damage to wings, fuselage, and tail sections.
    • Concerns: Structural failures were less common, but significant damage could lead to catastrophic failures if critical components were hit.
  4. Landing and Takeoff Accidents:
    • Incidents: Given the B-17's size and weight, landing and takeoff incidents occurred, particularly on rough or poorly prepared airstrips.
    • Concerns: Handling during these phases required careful attention to speed, alignment, and terrain conditions.


Notable Incidents:


  1. The Battle of Bremen (April 17, 1943):
    • A significant loss of B-17s occurred during this mission, with many aircraft heavily damaged or shot down by German defenses. This highlighted both the vulnerabilities and the resilience of the B-17 in sustained combat operations.
  2. The Schweinfurt–Regensburg Mission (October 14, 1943):
    • This mission resulted in high B-17 losses, illustrating the dangers of deep penetration missions without adequate fighter escort. Despite the losses, the B-17s that returned showcased the aircraft's ability to absorb damage and protect its crew.


Comparison to Other Aircraft in its Category:


  • B-24 Liberator: The B-24 had a higher top speed and longer range but was considered more vulnerable to damage and harder to fly. The B-17's safety record benefited from its rugged construction and better high-altitude performance.
  • Avro Lancaster: The British Lancaster could carry a heavier bomb load but had less defensive armament. The B-17's extensive defensive guns contributed to a perception of better crew survivability.
  • Consolidated B-32 Dominator: Less known than the B-17, the B-32 had similar roles late in the war but didn't match the B-17's production numbers or combat record. Its safety record is less documented due to limited use.


Peacetime and Post-War Record:


  • Restoration and Airshow Incidents: In the post-war era, B-17s have been used in airshows, movies, and as historical exhibits. Incidents in this context are often related to mechanical failures due to aging parts and the challenges of maintaining vintage aircraft.
  • Modern Safety Measures: Restoration efforts today often include modern safety measures and careful maintenance to ensure the safe operation of surviving B-17s.


The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress has a commendable safety record, particularly given the extreme conditions it operated under during World War II. Its design allowed it to endure significant damage and still bring its crew home, a testament to its ruggedness and reliability. Compared to other heavy bombers of its era, the B-17 was highly regarded for its defensive capabilities and survivability, making it a standout in its category.


Acquisition Cost:


The original acquisition cost of a Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress during World War II was approximately $238,329 per aircraft. This cost covered the materials, manufacturing, and assembly processes at the time, which were significant given the advanced design and robust construction of the B-17G​.


Today, the value of a fully restored Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress can vary depending on its condition, historical significance, and completeness. Modern valuations for airworthy B-17s range between $3 million to $9 million.


Comparison to Other Aircraft in its Class


When comparing the B-17's original acquisition cost to other heavy bombers of its era:


  • Consolidated B-24 Liberator: The B-24 had a lower unit cost of around $297,627, though production efficiencies later reduced this cost significantly.
  • Avro Lancaster: This British heavy bomber cost approximately £45,000 (around $180,000 USD at the time), making it slightly less expensive than the B-17.


While the initial investment in a B-17 during World War II was substantial, today's values reflect both the historical significance and the meticulous care required to maintain and restore these iconic bombers.




The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress stands as a symbol of American ingenuity and resilience during World War II. Its robust design, formidable defensive armament, and capacity for sustaining heavy damage underscored its nickname, the "Flying Fortress." From its initial conceptualization addressing the evolving needs of military aviation, through its extensive production and numerous variants, the B-17 proved its worth in countless missions over Europe and the Pacific. Today, the surviving B-17s serve as flying tributes to the brave crews who operated them and the engineers who designed them. Whether viewed through the lens of historical significance or technical achievement, the B-17 remains a remarkable chapter in aviation history, continuing to inspire pilots and aviation enthusiasts worldwide.

Photo Credit:




Boeing Official Website


The Museum of Flight


National Museum of the U.S. Air Force


Aviation Safety Network


Air Force Historical Research Agency


Essco Links:


Boeing B-17


Boeing B-29


Boeing B-47


Boeing 707


Consolidated B-24


Wright R-1820

Previous article Aviation Appreciation Friday! The Wright Brothers 🛩️
Next article Number 27 of 100 in 100, The Lockheed P-38 Lightning ✈️⚡